Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 00:31
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
What’s next?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
What is the most heartbreaking or sad love story that you ever had (experienced)?
Thank you.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
United Switches Off Starlink Internet on Regional Jets After Static Problem - WSJ
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
NASA’s CODEX Captures Unique Views of Sun’s Outer Atmosphere - NASA Science (.gov)
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Just in the last 5 years:
Volcano Found Hiding 'In Plain Sight' Right Next to NASA Mars Rover - ScienceAlert